So...Netflix had a
bunch of interesting stuff released recently. Honestly I don't get as
much time to binge streaming services as I like, but when I do I try
to be particular about it. If I'm not trying to make a dent in my
anime backlog with Crunchyroll, I do occasionally see what's on
Netflix, if only to see what exactly is getting mainstream viewers
excited or pissy. The Netflix Marvel shows, 13 Reasons Why, Orange is
the New Black, whenever shows like these become water cooler
discussion in this day and age, it's always prudent to keep your hand
on the service's pulse.
But since my prose
is far too long-winded for its own good, I decided to make My
Thoughts this time around be more rapidfire. Just quick thoughts and
observations I have developed catching my share of the streaming
service-viewing public.
First some very
quick rapidfire thoughts on stuff I may have mentioned once upon a
time.
The Marvel
Netflix Shows
When I actually started reading comics I enjoyed my share of the
brighter and more entertaining stuff. For example Dan Slott's run on
Amazing Spider-Man post- One More Day was my reintroduction to the
character and reminded me of why I loved the webhead; even while I am
in agreement with everyone that One More Day is one of the worst things
to ever happen to the character since The Clone Saga.
But I was also young and a had a dark streak as well. Reading stuff
like the mid-2000s run of Moon Knight up until the aftermath of the
Civil War story, the gothic supernatural action of Ghost Rider, and a
LOT of graphic novel trades of Batman including The Dark Knight
Returns, Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth, and his
final epic case before his death in Final Crisis, Batman R.I.P.
I'm a bit older now and can appreciate the camp, but I've always had
a soft spot for the more hardboiled and gritty heroes. The ones that
see a truly depressing and overwhelming world around them and declare
that it stops now, through bloody knuckles and broken teeth if
necessary.
So let's get to my thoughts on the shows with that in mind.
Daredevil
Probably my favorite of the Netflix Marvel shows by default. Great
action with stamina playing a factor. Love the supporting cast. Even
enjoy how the show goes from gritty gangland crime drama to hokey
comic book silliness when the ninja organization The Hand shows up.
Also Jon Bernthal is fantastic as the Punisher, but it's a
performance so intense and offputting with how realistically
portrayed it is, recontextualizing the character as an army veteran
dealing with depression and light PTSD as well as the loss of his
family, that it actually made it almost impossible to watch The
Punisher spin-off show. Maybe I'll get to it later.
What I don't like? Charlie Cox is a bit one note as the lead. The
re-imagined Elektra is a bit of a boring non-entity and is just there
to set up the Avengers-style crossover series, The Defenders. And the
usual Netflix production issues of flabby middle episodes just there
to stretch the run time.
Jessica Jones
Best show of the bunch. Kristen Ritter is phenomenal as the lead.
David Tennant is terrifying as Zedediah Kilgrave. Having the entire
season be about stopping a low end supervillain by way of noir
detective thriller scratches all of my itches. Not to mention Jones'
history with Kilgrave as a very blunt allegory for Rape/Abuse
Survival is potent as hell. What I didn't like was the subplot
involving shady pharmaceuticals basically goes nowhere.
Luke Cage
A classic example of a show I can appreciate is great, but that I
have to confess is not for me. The cast is great, the acting is
great, the production design is solid, the source material is paid
proper respect. But I never finished the season. Due to one reason or
another, the racial tension atmosphere baked into the production, the
hip-hop meets early 70s blaxploitation film vibe, or even just a case
of Marvel burn out, I quietly bowed out of this show. Not because
it's awful, far from it, but because it was preaching to a different
choir. Say what you will about me, I will not be surprised if you
love this show.
Iron Fist
I saw several clips of this show and wanted to punch it in the face.
I love kung-fu movies. I love kung fu characters. I even love Iron
Fist in concept. He's a guy that learned martial arts and because he
was so awesome he got superpowers from the spirit of a dragon. But
the show took the most fantastic character in the entire Netflix
series line-up and made him an annoying entitled little shit. Bad
fight choreography, terrible casting, reduction happened in the worst
possible areas and it is just....ugh.
The Defenders
Never started the show. Blame Iron Fist.
Moving on!
Bright
The minute I found out David Ayer was directing and the production
didn't even have a proper screenwriter, I had a bad feeling about the
movie the minute it went live.
And I was right. An urban fantasy cop drama that wants to be LA
Confidential or Training Day with elves and
magic but winds up playing like the movie Crash with DnD stuff
awkwardly bolted on. And less subtle....somehow.
Devilman Crybaby
Holy shit.
Seriously that's all I got. An ultraviolent, hypersexualized radical
re-imagining of a beloved fifty-year old Japanese manga hero animated
by one of the most underrated directors in the industry. Half of the
stuff that happens in this show was stuff I thought couldn't happen
with Netflix's standards and practices, and yet they did. Over. And
over. And over again.
It isn't just cheap shock either. This show tells a taut, if
extremely dark and violent, story of human nature and the literal and
metaphysical end of the world. It's also a limited ten episode season
so things actually have solid pacing to them.
If you enjoy anime, watch this now.
And now for the core reason why I wanted to bring up my thoughts on
Netflix stuff.
I want to discuss....
The Cloverfield
Paradox
Oh dear god I am getting so sick and tired of J.J. Abrams' marketing
schtick!
I brought this up before in my thoughts on Star Wars: The Last Jedi
but I have a bit of an axe to grind with this particular film
director and creative producer. In terms of actual filmmaking, Abrams
is a solid talent. The original Cloverfield was an enjoyable found
footage monster movie. Super 8 was a fun Spielberg pastiche in the
vein of ET, The Force Awakens was a welcome return to the Star Wars
universe, and despite how disastrous the ending, the first few
seasons of Lost were full of highly entertaining character drama.
But it's how Abrams markets and presents his projects that always
annoy me: the Mystery Box angle. When Cloverfield hit theaters, many
people were greatly disappointed despite the actual film's quality.
Why? Because the marketing for the film up to that point was full of
misdirection and online viral campaigns. At one point people thought
the movie was actually an American proper remake of Godzilla or a
Voltron movie. Yes really. Abrams said nothing and let the
speculation run wild. Yes, this lead to a pretty excellent box office
for the movie, but there was notable backlash.
And this pattern keeps repeating itself with JJ Abrams' filmography.
Lost had three good seasons, but the intrigue was so built up, the
show became a ratings smash...and the writers clearly had no plans to
actually answer the mysteries they had set up. The Force Awakens was
pumped full of empty spaces of potential, practically begging for the
audience to fill in the blanks themselves. Then The Last Jedi hit and
answered every lingering question with anticlimactic answers. It's
the perfect storm of utilizing the social media rumor mill and the
overwhelming trend of modern blockbuster filmmaking to “logic”
everything together; to make every little detail be connected as part
of some elaborate tapestry instead of just letting things settle on
their own. But the answers and the reveals are always disappointing for how much effort goes into them that it can actually do damage.
In fact, I thought Abrams' production was actually going to go in the
exact opposite direction of this approach when it came to the second
film to hold the Cloverfield name: 10 Cloverfield Lane. A pretty
solid paranoia thriller with Mary-Elizabeth Winstead and John Goodman. But the thing is
the movie was originally called The Cellar and was directed by Dan
Trachtenberg, until it was revamped by JJ Abrams' production company,
Bad Robot. But there was no hard connections between the film's conflict of people trapped in a doomsday bunker wondering if the world came to an end and the giant monster rampaging through New York in the original Cloverfield.
In other words, it looked like Abrams was trying to take the idea of
Cloverfield as a brand and turn it into a big budget sci-fi anthology
film series like The Twilight Zone or Tales from the Crypt. Genre
films with a focus on character and drama all connected by a title.
But what everybody else was expecting was hard evidence and Marvel
Cinematic Universe-style connections to the original film, no matter
how badly those connections would ultimately dilute and trivialize
the central conflict of 10 Cloverfield Lane.
Now, we have The Cloverfield Paradox, the third film in this series
that was shadowdropped onto Netflix after Super Bowl LII, and has
been marketed heavily as a prequel to the original movie and holding
the secrets to the “Cloververse.”
Which is the greatest thing crippling this movie: the weight of this
branding. Whenever it isn't dedicating its run time to laboriously
explain and answer questions that nobody really asked, the movie
itself is quite entertaining.
The set-up is that it is some time in the not too distant future and
Earth is going through an energy crisis. So the world puts together
what money and resources they have for a huge space station in orbit
around the planet and a top of the line particle accelerator. The
mission by the crew is to...basically throw science at the wall and
see if they can find a source of unlimited energy by locating a
Macguffin particle.
Yes, the science is so soft it barely makes sense in comic books.
On the space station are a freaking Beneton ad of diversity including
Zhang Ziyi playing a Chinese physicist, Daniel Bruhl as a German
scientist, and our British female lead played by Gugu Mbatha-Raw. Say
her name a few times out loud, it's fun.
Things take a weird turn when the team seemingly discovers an energy
source after firing their accelerator again, but it turns out
something went horribly wrong. The whole station blacks out, Earth is
nowhere to be seen, and unexplained stuff starts happening on the
ship. With everything out of whack, the crew has to figure out what
just happened and how to return to Earth.
That is basically the rest of the movie: a riff on Event Horizon but
with parallel universes. Characters phase in and out of existence,
personal histories mix and clash, and freaky things keep happening
with gravity, physics, and magnets.
And as a low-rent schlocky sci-fi thriller, it's not half bad.
There's a lot of stuff that only seems to be in the movie for novelty
more than function, but there are some genuinely beautiful character
moments. Acting MVP has to go to Gugu. She has a tragic backstory
involving her family and husband, and when it comes to getting a
glimpse of what might have been she doesn't miss a beat. It's a hell
of a performance.
But once again, the jumbo-sized elephant in the room that is in the
very title has to be addressed. Right before the scientists fire
their particle accelerator, there is a broadcast shown by a crazy
scientist on Earth who keeps begging the scientists to take caution.
Claiming that by punching holes in reality looking for this MacGuffin
particle, it could bring untold horrors into our world. Not just
through space but time itself. He even flat out says these could
include aliens, monsters, and demons. He even calls it The Cloverfield Paradox.
Yep, that's the big explanation for all the weird sci-fi stuff that
happens and will happen in the Cloververse going forward. A particle
accelerator borked with space-time looking for infinite energy and
messed everything up. Meaning regardless of
time period or location, you can blame the scientists on the
Cloverfield Space Station for forgetting to carry the one. Aren't you
glad you know now?
Well I'm not. The grand appeal of doing anthology-style genre
filmmaking is there is a continued suspension of disbelief when it
comes to big ideas. Did we need overly complicated mythology or
interwoven narrative threads as to why Earth is suddenly occupied by
pigpeople at the end of an episode of The Twilight Zone? Of course
not, that would be silly. Small cameos and tenuous connections like
recurring characters, think Dr. Vink from Are You Afraid of the
Dark?, are acceptable but that's more the exception than the rule.
Also, the justification is so broad and boring it is effectively
meaningless. It's an overcomplicated and pretentious way to say,
“it's science magic, I ain't gotta explain shit.”
Much like 10 Cloverfield Lane, this movie was originally under a
different title and director. It was directed by Julius Onah, a
pretty underground talent in terms of mainstream film, and the
original film title was God Particle. But while 10 Cloverfield Lane only shared a name with prior movies, you
can actually feel how artificial and forced the Cloverfield
connections are in this film. There's even a painful final shot that made me want
to chuck my TV out the window.
But now it's gonna be picked clean by obsessive Cloververse fans
trying to figure out how incidental dialogue or events will somehow
tie things to the fourth film, which apparently is gonna be an
alternate history narrative set in World War II. Connections that are basically impossible since this movie basically wrote itself a blank check.
On the one hand, I never would have checked out this movie if it
weren't for the Cloverfield branding, and in a way I do appreciate
what Abrams' people at Bad Robot are trying to do by marketing these
kinds of movies. But the way they went about doing it feels both
insufferable and unnecessary.
Still at least it they put it on Netflix instead of charging a movie
ticket this time. There may have been panic in the streets!
No comments:
Post a Comment